Archive forwords

The Montreal Canadien (backfill)

Returning from Boston, I picked up a copy of La Presse, to keep my French limber — at least on the reading side of things.

I was surprised that the Montreal Canadiens were always referred to in the singular: as le Canadien.  Indeed, in La Presse’s sports section, the hockey tabs are for Canadien (no “s”) and Senateurs.

Wikipedia confirms that this is a common Francophone designation for the Habs.  Strangely, les Nordiques de Quebec was always conjugated in the plural.

Sadly, the Nordiques’ season-by-season NHL record doesn’t appear to be in Francophone Wikipedia — perhaps someone will put that right.  Even me.  Given enough time.  :)

Comments

Sweet!

“Someone” suggested an aggressively catchy title for the upcoming DeSmogBlog book.

I hope they’re one of the three finalists.  :)

Comments

Snowmageddon

Doubtless it’ll’ve lost its novelty by next year, but as far as neologisms go, “snowmageddon” is undeniably catchy.  People are all a-twitter about it…

(Hat tip to Robert at SmartPEI.)

Comments

Vikings and banking and fairies, oh my! (backfill)

I was reading a book of Viking wisdom yesterday.  It included the memorable line ‘no lamb for the lazy wolf‘ (a corollary for ‘the early bird gets the worm’) but peculiarly, no tips on plundering villages.  Personally, I prefer ‘the second worm doesn’t get eaten’, but that’s just me.

Banking and fairies below the fold!  :)

__(’Read the rest of this entry »’)

Comments

Back from a break… with some Engrish

Revving up the blogging again.

Mrs. EclecticLip and I went on a road trip with some friends, during the course of which we stopped at a small-town Chinese restaurant, which had the following on the menu.

An appetizing menu

As it turns out, they were chicken nuggets — and quality, chicken breast nuggets at that.  :)

We’ll see if I can get this onto the fail blog

Comments

Incensed at being “incented”

From the BBC, a list of loathed office jargon. And a Vancouverite has the top item — cool!

I must admit that I don’t mind being incentivized (the #4 item) — but I detest how that’s turning into being incented. Whatever happened to being motivated?

- - - - -

I was a bit surprised that empowered didn’t make it on the list. Maybe it’s no longer considered gauche corporate doublespeak — or maybe it’s become passe, destined for the dustbin of business-speak…

Personally, I wouldn’t mind seeing “empowered” face linguistic extinction, being rediscovered decades from now by corporate anthropologists scouring through historical texts… :-)

Comments

Juneau, Alaska, reduces energy usage 30%

From The Independent, a report on how — by necessity — the city of Juneau, Alaska (pop 30,000) reduced its energy consumption 30% within a month.

The article also references the fact that in 2001, Brazil (population 180,000,000) cut its electric consumption 20% within two months.
This is why I part opinions with some peak oil pessimists about how society will revert to anarchic barbarism* in the (imminent) post-peak years. I think communities are a lot more adaptable to hardship than pessimists give them credit for.

=====

*incidentally, the term barbarian has a cool etymology; I learned it — wow, fifteen years ago — from a Classical Studies professor. In James Robinson’s latest book, he notes that the naming system of the Middle East could have played a role as well: bar is a patronym in Aramaic, and is sometimes used in Jewish names (though “ben” is more frequent). Thus in the Christian New Testament, one finds characters such as Bartimaeus or Barabbas. (More about Barabbas, another time…)

Robinson suggested that Greeks dealing with Aramaic peoples would’ve remarked at how often they said bar-this and bar-that during introductions and decided to call them “bar-bar-ians”. No word whether Aramaics called the Greeks “son-of-son-of-ians”. Regrettably, like a number of Robinson’s arguments in this particular volume, it seemed a bit weak. From this reasonably widely-read unaffiliated non-expert’s perspective, Goulder’s lectionary theory seems stronger, by virtue of its elegant simplicity.

Comments

Next entries » ·